Surface Water on Mars? (Update: Probably Not)
Woah. If this is confirmed, it's big.
New analysis of Mars Rover images taken a couple of years ago in the "Endurance" crater seem to show standing pools of water on the Martian surface.
Along with fellow Lockheed engineer Daniel Lyddy, [physicist Ron] Levin used images from the Jet Propulsion Laboratory's website. The resulting stereoscopic reconstructions, made from paired images from the Opportunity rover's twin cameras, show bluish features that look perfectly flat. The surfaces are so smooth that the computer could not find any surface details within those areas to match up between the two images.The imaging shows that the areas occupy the lowest parts of the terrain. They also appear transparent: some features, which Levin says may be submerged rocks or pebbles, can be seen below the plane of the smooth surface.
This would greatly boost the likelihood of finding near-surface Martian life; in fact, the father of one of the authors, Gilbert Levin, laid out the evidence for Martian life (PDF) in a paper delivered at the Carnegie Institution Geophysical Laboratory last month, relying in part on the water discovery. Gilbert Levin was principal investigator on the Viking lander experiment that appeared to show signs of life.
The main argument against this idea is that the density of the Martian atmosphere is so close to vacuum that water coming to the surface should just sublime away instantly. But some areologists have proposed that water may be able to exist for longer periods on the surface if certain conditions are met -- conditions that are most likely to occur in deep craters like Endurance.
Update: It looks like Ron Levin didn't do his homework on this. Follow the link Peter Erwin provides in the comments. Short version: the image that Levin processed for his research turns out, when examined in context, to be part of a tilted cliff face, not a horizontal surface -- not a good spot for still water.
Comments
Okay, now I'm prepared for little green men.
Amazing news.
Posted by: csven | June 8, 2007 5:41 PM
Yeah, the atmospheric pressure on Mars, at about 0.007 atmospheres, is really low... Have you followed up with Levin for more details (assuming it's the Ron Levin I am thinking of)?
I read the article but I am wondering if they have managed to duplicate the conditions in a lab or of this is more speculation than anything else. This would actually seem not too difficult to simulate; the pressure, temperature, and other factors are known quantities.
Posted by: Howard Berkey | June 10, 2007 11:57 AM
Emily Lakdawalla over at the Planetary Society blog did some investigative work (When was the image taken? OK, so where was the rover when that was taken? etc.) and figured out that it's a picture taken looking up the steep slope of a crater wall! So, as she puts it, "Those can't be puddles -- unless the amazing 'liquid' that puddles here on Mars in a freezing near-vacuum also has antigravity properties. A less sensational hypothesis is that the smooth 'fluid' that fills local lows between rocks on this sloping surface is fine dust."
The problem is that Levin apparently didn't check the context of the individual image; Lakdawalla includes a larger image in approximate true color (no more misleading blue color for the "water") that shows the slope and the rim of the crater up on top...
Posted by: Peter Erwin | June 11, 2007 7:59 AM
Thanks for that link, Peter -- I'll update the post.
Posted by: Jamais Cascio | June 11, 2007 9:48 AM
Ouch. So it was pure speculation after all. That's gotta hurt.
Posted by: Howard Berkey | June 11, 2007 1:12 PM
There is a possibility that food and water is not a requirement to create another life. Maybe that is just applicable to our planet. Maybe in some other planet other life forms only need gas to live.
But about the water in mars, this increases the probability that there is a life inside mars.
Posted by: c0de | June 13, 2007 3:04 PM